💡 $140M Ponzi Schemes, Disaster-Relief Marketing Gold, and a Fair Lending Loophole That Could Haunt Banks | Marketing’s Most Wanted

Hi Marketing Wranglers,

This week is a crash course in how trust, regulation, and storytelling collide in financial services.

From a $140 million Ponzi scheme built on investor FOMO, to Texas banks turning disaster relief into a community trust play, to the OCC quietly rolling back a key anti-discrimination test that could reshape fair lending enforcement. There’s plenty for compliance and marketing teams to chew on.

🚨 In This Week’s Issue

🚨 The $140M FOMO Trap: How First Liberty’s “Safe” Returns Became a Ponzi Nightmare (and why bad marketing is often the best sales tool)

🏦 When Storms Meet Banking: FDIC Steps Up for Texas Institutions (and how smart community marketing can build loyalty)

💥 Fair Lending Loophole? The OCC Pulls Back on Disparate Impact Tests (and why ignoring bias could turn into your next PR and compliance disaster)

New Slack Community:
Thinking about how to use AI in marketing? We’re having that discussion in our community here.

Warrant Partner Directory

Need marketing, compliance, or legal help? Visit the Warrant Directory for a curated list of experts we recommend.

🚨 The $140M FOMO Trap: How First Liberty's "Safe" Returns Became a Ponzi Nightmare

Picture this: You're scrolling through investment opportunities when you stumble across First Liberty Building & Loan. They're offering 18% returns on "safe" bridge loans. The founder, Edwin Brant Frost IV, assures you that defaults are rare and your money is backing real businesses getting SBA loans.

For over a decade, around 300 investors bought into this dream. They handed over $140 million, believing they'd found the holy grail of investing: high returns with low risk.

Spoiler alert: They hadn't.

The Unraveling

The SEC just dropped the hammer on what they're calling a massive Ponzi scheme that ran from 2014 to June 2025. While investors thought their money was funding legitimate business loans, the reality was far messier.

Most of those "safe" loans? They defaulted. By 2021, First Liberty wasn't even pretending to be a legitimate lender anymore. It had become a classic Ponzi operation: robbing Peter to pay Paul while the whole house of cards slowly collapsed.

Follow the Money Trail

Where did $140 million go? Well, some of it went to early investors to keep up appearances. But a significant chunk lined Frost's pockets:

• $2.4 million in personal credit card payments

• $335,000 to a rare coin dealer (?!)

• $230,000 on family vacations

The Red Flags Were Waving

Translation: If someone's promising you 18% returns with minimal risk, it’s likely misleading marketing.

The Aftermath

The SEC has frozen assets, appointed a receiver, and is pursuing the full legal playbook: permanent injunctions, civil penalties, and asset recovery. Frost and First Liberty haven't admitted guilt but agreed to the emergency relief measures.

For the 300 investors who got caught up in this scheme, it's a harsh reminder that the investment world's oldest rule still applies: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

The Marketing Lesson

This case is a masterclass in how persuasive marketing can turn dangerous when built on false promises. Frost didn't just sell an investment: he sold a story. A story about safety, expertise, and guaranteed returns that played directly into investors' FOMO.

As Jeffries noted, "We have seen this movie before. Bad actors lure investors with promises of seemingly over-generous returns, and it does not end well."

For anyone in financial marketing, this is your wake-up call. Regulators are watching, and the line between compelling marketing and misleading promises has never been clearer or more dangerous to cross.

Read more on SEC news.

🏦 When Mother Nature Meets Banking: FDIC Steps Up for Storm-Hit Texas Institutions

The FDIC just rolled out regulatory relief for Texas financial institutions hammered by severe storms, straight-line winds, and flooding since July 2, 2025. With Kerr County already designated as a federal disaster area by FEMA, this isn't just another regulatory memo gathering dust on compliance desks.

This is a masterclass in how community-focused lending, transparent communication, and regulatory cooperation can turn a crisis into a trust-building goldmine.

The Perfect Storm Meets Banking Reality

The storms brought more than downed power lines, they tragically claimed lives and left many still missing. They also disrupted financial operations and left countless customers unable to meet financial obligations. The FDIC's response? A clear signal that they'll support banks doing the right thing for their communities.

"Efforts to work with borrowers in communities under stress can be consistent with safe-and-sound banking practices and in the public interest," the agency stated.

Translation: Help your customers, document it properly, and we'll have your back.

What Compliance Teams Need to Do Right Now

Document Everything: Every loan modification, extension, or adjusted lending practice needs a paper trail. The FDIC won't criticize prudent efforts to help borrowers, but they'll expect you to show your work. Keep detailed records of borrower communication and the rationale behind every decision.

Think CRA: The Community Reinvestment Act isn't just compliance busy work right now. It's an opportunity. Community development loans, investments, and services that help revitalize disaster areas can earn CRA consideration. Smart institutions are already identifying qualifying activities and making sure they're properly recorded.

The Relief Package: What's Actually Available

Reporting Flexibility: Storm-related delays in filing Reports of Income and Condition? Contact the Dallas Regional Office. The FDIC will evaluate what's truly beyond your control before setting acceptable delay periods. Publishing requirements for branch closings, relocations, or temporary facilities also get relaxed treatment.

Consumer Lending Wiggle Room: Regulation Z allows consumers to waive the standard three-day rescission period on principal dwelling-secured loans during "bona fide personal financial emergencies." Just make sure you get a signed statement from the consumer describing their emergency.

Fast-Track Facilities: Need temporary banking facilities? A phone call to the Dallas Regional Office will generally suffice initially, with written confirmation following later.

Marketing's Moment to Shine (Responsibly)

This is marketing gold, but handle it carefully. Campaigns highlighting loan assistance programs, extended repayment options, and community development initiatives can showcase your institution as a reliable community partner. The key word? Showcase what you're actually doing.

Overpromising financial relief or implying guaranteed loan approvals will come back to haunt you. Regulatory scrutiny has a long memory, and customer trust is fragile. Align your messaging with your actual capabilities and offerings.

The Reputation Play

Disaster relief scenarios aren't just operational headaches. They're reputation-defining moments that separate community banks from faceless corporations. Institutions that respond quickly and transparently can:

• Strengthen their local market presence

• Improve CRA evaluation outcomes

• Position themselves as true community anchors

• Build customer loyalty that lasts long after the cleanup crews leave

This isn't just about weathering a storm (literally). It's about proving your institution's value when it matters most. Compliance and marketing teams need to work together now, ensuring regulatory expectations and customer trust drive every decision.

More details on FDIC news.

💥 Fair Lending Loophole? OCC Pulls Back on Key Anti-Discrimination Test

The OCC just handed lenders what looks like a regulatory free pass, but it could backfire in ways that ripple across compliance and marketing teams.

Bloomberg Law’s Evan Weinberger reports that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and at least one other federal banking regulator will no longer use the “disparate impact” test in fair lending reviews, focusing only on outright “disparate treatment.” In simple terms, if your underwriting is not explicitly biased, regulators are not asking too many questions.

What’s Changing Under Fair Lending Rules

The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) prohibits discrimination based on race, sex, age, and other protected characteristics. Regulators historically enforced this in two ways:

• Disparate Treatment: The obvious stuff, such as directly factoring race or age into credit decisions.
  

• Disparate Impact: The subtle stuff, when neutral-seeming policies such as ZIP codes, mobile carriers, or education history disproportionately harm a protected group, with no legitimate business justification and no less discriminatory alternative.

By dropping disparate impact, the OCC is essentially saying that as long as you are not explicitly discriminatory, you are safe. But that is not the whole story.

Compliance Whiplash: Why This “Win” Might Backfire

Here is the catch:

1. The Law Has Not Changed – ECOA’s legislative history explicitly contemplated disparate impact, and the Supreme Court has upheld it as a valid legal theory. State attorneys general and private litigants can still sue regardless of federal regulators’ stance.
   

2. Future Regulatory Snapback – A new administration could reinstate disparate impact reviews overnight, forcing banks to defend years of past underwriting.
   

3. Data Models Under Scrutiny – Algorithmic decision-making, already a hot topic in AI regulation, is a prime target. Marketing and product teams pushing “personalized” offers based on credit data should be extra careful. What looks like smart segmentation today could look like redlining in court tomorrow.

Why Marketers Should Care

Fair lending is not just a compliance problem. It is a brand and acquisition risk. If your credit products or marketing campaigns disproportionately target or exclude certain demographics, you are inviting scrutiny. Expect more headlines about algorithmic bias in ad targeting, especially as regulators worldwide crack down on AI-driven discrimination.

Savvy marketing teams will work with compliance early, auditing data models, testing for bias, and documenting why targeting choices make sense. The OCC may not be looking, but consumer advocates, journalists, and state regulators definitely are.

💬 We’re launching a community for Marketing, Compliance, and Legal teams to stay up to date on regulatory changes—and help each other navigate them.

→ Join the community here.